The Five-Minute Forums

The Five-Minute Forums (http://www.fiveminute.net/forums/index.php)
-   Fiver By Committee (http://www.fiveminute.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Announcement (http://www.fiveminute.net/forums/showthread.php?t=1375)

ijdgaf 04-27-2007 01:40 AM

S'alright, not really badgering. Just trying ineptly to uncleverly extend your previous metaphor.

Got a problem with that? We'll take it to Metaphree-for-all.

Nate the Great 04-27-2007 02:31 AM

It's always fun to meet other BnL fans.

Star Wars is hardly 100% fantasy. It's not 100% scifi either, but there are things like hyperdrive and light sabres that are theoretically mere extensions of current technology. I call that stuff scifi. For that matter, by introducing the idea of midicholorians, they're increasing the scifi quotient.

mudshark 04-27-2007 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nate the Great (Post 73409)

Star Wars is hardly 100% fantasy.

Of course not. It's a fair part Space Western, as well.

Nate the Great 04-27-2007 01:45 PM

Is anybody else feeling like a person being sucked down a whirlpool the way this discussion is going?

Zeke 04-27-2007 05:40 PM

I feel like a person being eaten by a giant six-headed mermaid thing. Does that count?

Chancellor Valium 04-27-2007 07:41 PM

Would the nay-sayers like to elaborate on why they are so negative?

:p

Zeke 04-27-2007 08:14 PM

And I suppose you'd feel positive while a six-headed mermaid thing was eating you?

Nate the Great 04-27-2007 09:12 PM

We're being negative because the thread is meandering with nothing keeping it on track.

catalina_marina 04-27-2007 09:16 PM

I see that nothing has changed in the time I was away. :D

Zeke 04-27-2007 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nate the Great (Post 73422)
We're being negative because the thread is meandering with nothing keeping it on track.

Speak for yourself. My complete lack of objection to threads going off topic is on record.

MaverickZer0 04-27-2007 11:46 PM

I fail to see how threads going off-topic is a negative thing. We'd never get anywhere around here if we stayed on-topic. Or rather, we'd never get nowhere, which I'm sure is precisely where everyone wants to be.

ijdgaf 04-28-2007 12:02 AM

The only problem is when it happens during super-last-minute "oh crap, we really need to come up with a good theme week this year" discussions amongst the staff.

Nate the Great 04-28-2007 12:24 AM

Since when are we getting anywhere? :)

MaverickZer0 04-28-2007 06:45 PM

We're not getting anywhere. We're trying to get nowhere. That's why the threads go everywhere. We don't want to get anywhere, since there is no point to being 'anywhere' since just as soon as someone gets 'anywhere' they generally want to be 'anywhere else.' So I figured it might just be best to skip the anywheres, anywhere elses, and anywhere but heres, and just get nowhere. After all, 'nowhere' and 'nowhere else' are the same thing, aren't they?

Nate the Great 04-28-2007 07:05 PM

You're starting to sound like the Whether Man.

catalina_marina 04-29-2007 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaverickZer0 (Post 73433)
After all, 'nowhere' and 'nowhere else' are the same thing, aren't they?

Strictly speaking, 'nowhere' implies 'nowhere else', but not the other way. 'nowhere else' may be 'nowhere' but it may also be 'here'. Or where-ever 'nowhere else' is not.

MaverickZer0 04-29-2007 01:54 AM

In general though, I think we can all agree we're going nowhere. Which is good, as I believe it was established that's where we intend on going. Does anybody know when we'll get there? It should be in no time at all. I expect that's how long it would take to get nowhere. Of course, no time at all can mean both 'instantly' and 'infinitely', so to be safe, let's assume the shorter of the two and we'll already have arrived.

Do I? I haven't even read Phantom Tollbooth recently.

ijdgaf 04-29-2007 03:40 AM

My God, is that book ever a masterpiece.

Nate the Great 04-29-2007 06:53 PM

Ditto. Awesome book.

Milo: I never knew that words could be so confusing.
Tock: Only when you use a lot to say a little.

PointyHairedJedi 05-02-2007 05:29 PM

I still have my copy of that. It's not actually with me, sadly. :(

Nate the Great 05-02-2007 05:39 PM

Oh? I'm sorry I missed the funeral. I feel your pain. :)

I paid less than two dollars for mine. I'd gladly do it again if I found myself in a strange town, separated from my beloved book collection, and needing my biannual Juster fix.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.