View Single Post
  #72  
Old 03-19-2003, 05:21 PM
MmeBlueberry's Avatar
MmeBlueberry MmeBlueberry is offline
Future's so bright ya gotta wear shades
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 95
Send a message via AIM to MmeBlueberry Send a message via Yahoo to MmeBlueberry
Default

[color=#000000ost_uid0]Hmm...I always thought "and" was addition while "of" was multiplication. Oh well, I was only a math major for one semester.

Trying to get my thoughts together for refuting your proof. Basically, in your scenario, spending twice as much time (without money) is equal to spending time and money. Most women would probably want the money part and wouldn't accept the time = money substitution. Therefore, they would leave. Thus you're left with 2 time = 0.

It needs work, I know.[/colorost_uid0]
__________________
"There was a boy called Eustace Clarence Scrubb, and he almost deserved it." --The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, C. S. Lewis
Reply With Quote