I did take your meaning, Nate. (I don't need to tell you what I think of it...)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infinite Improbability
It's not like I'm ambitious enough to go over to startrek.com for research or anything.
|
Oh, me neither, I just knew offhand.
Quote:
Re: Flashback. Any thoughts on whether a Star Trek: Excelsior show would've really worked?
|
Not to overstate my case or anything, but not in a million billion years. I've never understood why anyone but Takei was into the Excelsior campaign. Sulu was by far the dullest character in TOS; no matter how cool a ship you give him, he's not interesting enough to base a show on. And if you're doing a prequel at all, you may as well do what ENT did and set it in an era we haven't explored much. Between the movie series and TNG, we know a great deal about Sulu's time.
Quote:
and finally getting an answer on how tribbles can leak out of an access door after the deluge is over is always a good thing.
|
Uh... can't they move a little?
Quote:
Think about it, Trek has endured because of what's underneath, the vision if you will.
|
This I can get behind. It's become a cliché to say it, but it's true.
__________________
FiveMinute.net: because stuff is long and life is short
[03:17]
FiveMinZeke: Galactica clearly needs the advanced technology of
scissors, which get around the whole "yanking on your follicles" problem.
[03:17]
IJD: cylons can hack any blades working in conjunction