![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I reserve all further judgement until I get an answer for the "original universe or Abrams-verse" question.
__________________
mudshark: Nate's just being...Nate. Zeke: It comes nateurally to him. mudshark: I don't expect Nate to make sense, really -- it's just a bad idea. Sa'ar Chasm on the 5M.net forum: Sit back, relax, and revel in the insanity. Adam Savage: I reject your reality and substitute my own! Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. Crow T. Robot: Oh, stop pretending there's a plot. Don't cheapen yourself further. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agreed. We really don't know anything until we know that.
My guess is original, by the way. The announcement specifically mentions that there's no connection to the next movie, and while that could still be true of an Abramsverse show, I think stressing the point tells us something about Paramount's current feelings. They really expected better results from Into Darkness -- maybe they're just going to finish the trilogy and write it off. (Also revealing: the planned line of Abramsverse novels was scrapped. Pocket Books has stuck with the original timeline.)
__________________
FiveMinute.net: because stuff is long and life is short [03:17] FiveMinZeke: Galactica clearly needs the advanced technology of scissors, which get around the whole "yanking on your follicles" problem. [03:17] IJD: cylons can hack any blades working in conjunction |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
They just a few weeks ago renegotiated the actors for a fourth movie. So we're getting at least another after Beyond.
__________________
Wowbagger Forum Lurker CURRENTLY: I've finally dived into the "let's everybody make a fan film" Kool-Aid. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|