![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I may have known at one time that I knew that, but it was a known that had become unknown by the time I posted it. Then again, I should probably have known.
__________________
Methinks Ted Sturgeon was too kind. 'Yes, but I think some people should be offended.' -- John Cleese (on whether he thought some might be offended by Monty Python) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This was unknown until the time that it was made known, and so in being an unknown unknown was in fact a known that was unknown by those that should have known?
__________________
O to be wafted away From this black aceldama of sorrow; Where the dust of an earthy today Is the earth of a dusty tomorrow! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, there are knowns and there are unknowns, and then there are the things you didn't actually know, yet somehow intuitively "know" are true. Now, I don't know for sure, but I think it possible that, though it might have been an unknown unknown (or was it an unknown known? Make a note to check on that,) I could quite well have "known" something without actually knowing that I had known about it, beforehand.
You know? ![]()
__________________
Methinks Ted Sturgeon was too kind. 'Yes, but I think some people should be offended.' -- John Cleese (on whether he thought some might be offended by Monty Python) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So what was previously said to be an unknown unknown may in fact have been known at the time it was thought to have been unknown and therefore have either been an unknown known or a known unknown - know what I mean?
__________________
O to be wafted away From this black aceldama of sorrow; Where the dust of an earthy today Is the earth of a dusty tomorrow! |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You never know...
__________________
Methinks Ted Sturgeon was too kind. 'Yes, but I think some people should be offended.' -- John Cleese (on whether he thought some might be offended by Monty Python) |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"I don't know. A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof, and when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven."
__________________
The first run through of any experimental procedure is to identify any potential errors by making them. |
![]() |
|
|