The Five-Minute Forums  

Go Back   The Five-Minute Forums > FiveMinute.net > Science Fiction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-28-2004, 06:09 PM
Derek's Avatar
Derek Derek is offline
Dean of misderektion
Senior Staff
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sector 001
Posts: 1,106
Default

[color=#000000ost_uid0]Speaking of avatars, I noticed we can supersize our avatars.

<- It just looks wrong being so big.[/colorost_uid0]
__________________
"Please, Aslan," said Lucy, "what do you call soon?"
"I call all times soon," said Aslan; and instantly he vanished away and Lucy was alone with the Magician.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-28-2004, 08:12 PM
Nan Nan is offline
Gatekeeper
Exosite Head
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The 'Ship-Free Zone.
Posts: 1,455
Send a message via ICQ to Nan Send a message via Yahoo to Nan
Default

[color=#000000ost_uid0]I like it! I can use the Hawkgirl icon that my friend made me this way. [/colorost_uid0]
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-28-2004, 08:16 PM
Nan Nan is offline
Gatekeeper
Exosite Head
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The 'Ship-Free Zone.
Posts: 1,455
Send a message via ICQ to Nan Send a message via Yahoo to Nan
Default

[color=#000000ost_uid0]Plus, a Mace of Smiting is much better than a Naginata.[/colorost_uid0]
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-28-2004, 09:59 PM
mudshark's Avatar
mudshark mudshark is offline
Is he ever gonna hit Krazy Kat, or what?
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UMRK
Posts: 1,738
Default

[color=#000000ost_uid0][quoteost_uid0="Derek"]Speaking of avatars, I noticed we can supersize our avatars.[/quoteost_uid0]
Oh, [iost_uid0]that's[/iost_uid0] what it is. Mine just started doing it all by itself yesterday. Doesn't quite have the resolution to be that large, does it?

Edit: Yeah, looks better in the smaller size.[/colorost_uid0]
__________________
Methinks Ted Sturgeon was too kind.

'Yes, but I think some people should be offended.'
-- John Cleese (on whether he thought some might be offended by Monty Python)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-28-2004, 09:59 PM
catalina_marina's Avatar
catalina_marina catalina_marina is offline
Surfin' you say?
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: North-West of the South-East of Nowhere.
Posts: 4,949
Send a message via ICQ to catalina_marina Send a message via AIM to catalina_marina Send a message via MSN to catalina_marina Send a message via Yahoo to catalina_marina
Default

[color=#000000ost_uid0]I agree. You can do much more with this size.

<-- Line of Sea Cats.[/colorost_uid0]
__________________
~Bachelor of Science Marijke

I'm not the devil, I just work for her.

What spoon? There is no spoon. According to Zeke, it's a cat. ~NeoMatrix

"Apparently we're on the wrong side. Or the right side if you like winning." ~Spike

Sa'ar Chasm: Too far south you hit Belgium.
catalina marina: Not in Limburg you don't.
Sa'ar Chasm: You do if you go south in the right way.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-29-2004, 01:30 AM
sweetclover's Avatar
sweetclover sweetclover is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 32
Default

[quoteost_uid0="mudshark"][color=#000000ost_uid0]Didn't recognize you without your Kes avatar.[/colorost_uid0][/quoteost_uid0]
[color=#000000ost_uid0]Better? [/colorost_uid0]
__________________
If knowledge is power...
And power corrupts...
I can study hard...
And become EVIL!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-29-2004, 02:25 AM
Zeke's Avatar
Zeke Zeke is offline
The lens that flares in the night
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 3,396
Send a message via ICQ to Zeke Send a message via AIM to Zeke Send a message via Yahoo to Zeke
Default

[quoteost_uid0="Kira"][color=#000000ost_uid0][quoteost_uid0="Zeke"]Excuse me? Need I remind you who was the [iost_uid0]last[/iost_uid0] Starfleet captain to make a daring mission to steal some kind of warp coil?[/quoteost_uid0]

Pfft, from the Borg.[/colorost_uid0][/quoteost_uid0]
[color=#000000ost_uid0]I agree, but it's worth noting that by the same reasoning, it's fine to rob banks -- they gouge customers with high interest rates and they have plenty of money anyway. [/colorost_uid0]
__________________
FiveMinute.net: because stuff is long and life is short

[03:17] FiveMinZeke: Galactica clearly needs the advanced technology of scissors, which get around the whole "yanking on your follicles" problem.
[03:17] IJD: cylons can hack any blades working in conjunction
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-29-2004, 02:30 AM
Kira's Avatar
Kira Kira is offline
Annoy, tiny blonde one! Annoy like the wind!
Former Staff
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mars
Posts: 780
Send a message via ICQ to Kira Send a message via MSN to Kira Send a message via Yahoo to Kira
Default

[color=#000000ost_uid0][iost_uid0]We are the Bank of Montreal. You will be assessed a service fee. Resistance is futile.[/iost_uid0][/colorost_uid0]
__________________
\"It\'s all fun and games until one of you gets my foot up your ass.\"
--Veronica Mars
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-29-2004, 04:47 AM
Gatac's Avatar
Gatac Gatac is offline
Man in the iron mask
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Magdeburg, Germany
Posts: 667
Send a message via ICQ to Gatac Send a message via AIM to Gatac
Default

[color=#000000ost_uid0]Actual similarities to banks I know withstanding...

Standard diplomatic protocols don't really count with the Borg. You blow them up or they get you, and they can not be reasoned with. (Unless you're Kathryn Janeway, but in that case, stop reading this thread and get some more coffee, you look tired.) The Federation and pretty much the rest of the galaxy is involved in an undeclared war with them. Under such circumstances, raiding (if possible) is reasonable, even to b expected. It's Guerilla tactics, because, compared to the Borg, the Federation's not really all that strong in a direct confrontation.

Now, Archer's victims...that's first strike policy. Archer effectively reduces himself to a pirate there, and it's not even September 19th. They have not engaged in any hostile acts, they are not dangerous, they have not (as far as we know) done something that would justify an assault. Archer's the aggressor here, and he knows it, which gives him the blues.

The Bank example falls flat because the sheer size and material wealth of the Borg collective does not justify stealing from them. Their attitude and the inability to enter negotiations with them does. If I were to declare a state of war on the Bank of Montreal (me as head of my own little nation) after failing to have any meaningful negotiations with them, and that would follow them sending a few bankers and accountants around to kidnap my family and brainwash them into working for them, it would be justifiable for me, upon conquering their bank safe Rambo-style, to loot their cash - as far as I am aware, that's not a war crime. It would look bad if I specifically robbed the lockers of private customers of their valuables instead of merely targetting the catch-all money reserves, but we're not doing that with the Borg - they're basically *all* money reserves.

Sure, it's not normally legal, but we're in a state of war. A lot of things are justifiable when you're eating a machinegun sandwich. It's ugly, sure, but you're already in some deep slag when you're doing it - nicking some money is the least you could do.

So, in conclusion, the Borg example still doesn't count for me.

Gatac[/colorost_uid0]
__________________
Katy: Can I have the skill 'drive car off bridge and have parachute handy'?
Justin: It's kind of a limited skill.
Greg: Depends on how often you drive off bridges.
- d02 Quotes
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-29-2004, 09:40 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Seeing what's out there
Former Staff
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 514
Default

[color=#000000ost_uid0]

A number of Trek episodes -- such as "Damage," "In the Pale Moonlight," "Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges," "Equinox," and "The Void" -- explore variants of the same tough moral question. Simply stated, that question is: When you face a situation in which the only apparent way to survive is to do something immoral, should you sacrifice your principles for the sake of survival, or should you stay true to your principles even if it means that you might not survive?

Trek has sometimes ducked around this question by offering a "third way out" -- for instance in "The Void," in which the Voyager crew manages to escape the Void *by* observing the principles of the Federation. (This episode reminded me of Kirk's great reply to Mara in "Day of the Dove," in which she argues that the Klingon Empire must expand by conquest in order to survive: "There's another way to survive: mutual trust and cooperation.") It's interesting to note, however, that Janeway's position in that episode is to put principle ahead of survival ("If we're only going to live for a week, let's do so as a Starfleet crew," or words to that effect).

Janeway's position parallels the absolutist ethical statement made in the movie "Judgment at Nuremberg" by the tribunal's presiding judge (played by Spencer Tracy) when he delivers his verdict. In his verdict, he makes reference to the political pressure to acquit the defendants brought onto him by the U.S. authorities, who want the West Germans as allies against the Russians and who feel that you don't get people on your side by sentencing their leaders to prison terms. Tracy's character says that in times of crisis, when a nation is threatened by an enemy, people sometimes feel that adopting the methods of the enemy is the only possible means of survival. He then says sharply, "The question becomes, Survival as *what*?" He argues that a nation "is what it stands for; it's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult, when it's tempting to look the other way, to do what is expedient rather than what is right."

What makes episodes like "Damage" and "In the Pale Moonlight" ethically difficult is that they explore the question of whether there is a point at which a moral wrong *can* justify a larger good. How small does the wrong have to be (say, stealing someone's warp coil?) and how large does the good have to be (say, saving billions of people?) before one is justified in taking that action? (To paraphrase Picard's comment in "Insurrection": How many does it take before it becomes *right*?)

"Damage" and "In the Pale Moonlight" are not episodes about whether such actions are right or wrong, because they clearly acknowledge that they are wrong. Rather, they are about whether these actions are *justifiable*. Both Archer and Sisko conclude that their actions are necessary ("Because I have no choice!"), but it is left up to the viewer to wrestle with the question of whether they made the right choice. What is clear in all these episodes, however, is that such choices should be made in full awareness of the excruciating ethical issues that they involve. It is unquestionably wrong to take unethical actions without remorse or hesitation, and the episodes are all clear on at least this point.

[/colorost_uid0]
__________________
Marc
5MNG Section Head
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.