![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Favorite fiver troupe | |||
| Janeway's addiction to coffee |
|
1 | 6.67% |
| Data's literalism and contraction use or nonuse |
|
0 | 0% |
| Self-aware computers and other inanimate objects |
|
0 | 0% |
| Slang use by otherwise uptight characters |
|
0 | 0% |
| Technical difficulties with sound and special effects |
|
0 | 0% |
| Characters mocking the plot they're in |
|
7 | 46.67% |
| Boneheaded decisions by villians |
|
1 | 6.67% |
| Gak! as the last word, particularly of redshirts |
|
4 | 26.67% |
| Subtle crossfiver references |
|
2 | 13.33% |
| Episode title bashing or explaining |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's not obscure to a Seuss fan, but it would be to most people. Only a few of Seuss's books have reached the level of pop-culture icon (The Cat in the Hat, The Grinch, Green Eggs and Ham, maybe the Lorax). The 500 Hats of Bartholomew Cubbins is a lot less likely to be on the radar.
Personally, I think of oobleck as the science-for-kids goop first. I'd forgotten its Seussian source.
__________________
FiveMinute.net: because stuff is long and life is short [03:17] FiveMinZeke: Galactica clearly needs the advanced technology of scissors, which get around the whole "yanking on your follicles" problem. [03:17] IJD: cylons can hack any blades working in conjunction |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The 500 Hats is a classic. One of my favorites is the very first Seuss kid's book, And to Think That I Saw it On Mulberry Street.
__________________
mudshark: Nate's just being...Nate. Zeke: It comes nateurally to him. mudshark: I don't expect Nate to make sense, really -- it's just a bad idea. Sa'ar Chasm on the 5M.net forum: Sit back, relax, and revel in the insanity. Adam Savage: I reject your reality and substitute my own! Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. Crow T. Robot: Oh, stop pretending there's a plot. Don't cheapen yourself further. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
In the days before the Chuck Jones Grinch was on TV every year (from Mulberry Street [1937] to Fox in Socks [1965], say) they were all just Dr. Seuss books. More people would have been able to recite from Green Eggs and Ham, most likely, but not by any sort of staggering margin. Bartholomew and the Oobleck would have been just one of the books, not particularly more obscure than any of the others.
__________________
Methinks Ted Sturgeon was too kind. 'Yes, but I think some people should be offended.' -- John Cleese (on whether he thought some might be offended by Monty Python) |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The first run through of any experimental procedure is to identify any potential errors by making them. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
...this? Edit: Nothing whatsoever to do with Oobleck, but here's another clip from the same guys, I think. (Sa'ar should like this.)
__________________
Methinks Ted Sturgeon was too kind. 'Yes, but I think some people should be offended.' -- John Cleese (on whether he thought some might be offended by Monty Python) Last edited by mudshark; 12-22-2006 at 09:25 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is Bartholemew the only Seuss main character (other than The Cat, of course), to get more than one book? I'm not counting the minor Seuss creatures, just the main (roughly) humanoid characters.
Ah, the old cornstarch routine. Liquid if moved softly, stiff if moved quickly. Is it just me, or do my threads tend to mutate at a faster rate than the average ones? Oh, and how did everyone like the live-action Seuss remakes? They can't hold a candle to the original cartoons, of course, but as plots that stand on their own.
__________________
mudshark: Nate's just being...Nate. Zeke: It comes nateurally to him. mudshark: I don't expect Nate to make sense, really -- it's just a bad idea. Sa'ar Chasm on the 5M.net forum: Sit back, relax, and revel in the insanity. Adam Savage: I reject your reality and substitute my own! Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. Crow T. Robot: Oh, stop pretending there's a plot. Don't cheapen yourself further. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|