|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Most-wanted Tech | |||
Warp dive/hyperdrive/jump gates/whatever 
|
   
|
2 | 20.00% |
Tricorders (whir whir whir  )
|
  
|
1 | 10.00% |
| Hyposprays (the real kind, not those tanks and hoses) |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| PADDs (we know they can do more than Palmpilots) |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Transporters (one that works) |
  
|
2 | 20.00% |
| Replicators (tea, Earl Grey, hot) |
  
|
4 | 40.00% |
| Commbadges (chirping optional) |
|
0 | 0% |
| Lightsabres (I see your Swartz is as big as mine) |
|
0 | 0% |
| Phasers (so we can blink them to death) |
|
1 | 10.00% |
| Cybernetic eyes (VISORs can look tacky) |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#25
12-25-2006, 08:34 AM
|
||||
|
||||
To guide this conversation back towards the thread topic, which do you think we're more likely to get first?
1. A true handheld hypospray. 2. An energy beam that can stun. 3. A handheld scanner that can detect heartbeats and body temperature from (let's say) five feet away. All of these things should be less than two hundred years away, in theory, so which do you think we'll get first? Not at the size that Star Trek has it, but at a size that can be carried around without too much trouble and run on fuel cells.
__________________
mudshark: Nate's just being...Nate. Zeke: It comes nateurally to him. mudshark: I don't expect Nate to make sense, really -- it's just a bad idea. Sa'ar Chasm on the 5M.net forum: Sit back, relax, and revel in the insanity. Adam Savage: I reject your reality and substitute my own! Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. Crow T. Robot: Oh, stop pretending there's a plot. Don't cheapen yourself further. 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode